Intel Core i5 Skylake Ubuntu Linux
Intel Core i5-6600K testing with a MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) v1.0 and Intel Sky Lake on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Core i5-6600K: 

	Processor: Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 15360MB, Disk: 256GB TS256GSSD370S, Graphics: Intel Sky Lake (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-996-generic (x86_64) 20160517, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: intel 2.99.917, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (git-015f220 2016-05-20 xenial-oibaf-ppa), Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 11738.33 |===============================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 11975.75 |===============================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 11986.58 |===============================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 9460.60 |================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 9565.32 |================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 9823.34 |================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 277.43 |=================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 284.43 |=================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 288.85 |=================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 276.85 |=================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 284.67 |=================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 287.93 |=================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 11886.28 |===============================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 12385.41 |===============================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 12692.92 |===============================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 9391.64 |================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 7995.43 |================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 277.09 |=================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 284.14 |=================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 283.07 |=================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 267.53 |=================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 265.07 |=================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 9569.86 |================================================


IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 242.22 |=================================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 31933.42 |===============================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 21942.80 |===============================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 24582.22 |===============================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 24593.73 |===============================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: BT.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 1418.60 |================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: EP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 160.26 |=================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 160.32 |=================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 160.08 |=================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: FT.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 6692.05 |================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: LU.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 13452.15 |===============================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: MG.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 9943.94 |================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: SP.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 3636.28 |================================================


Dolfyn 0.527
Computational Fluid Dynamics
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 32.63 |==================================================


LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 1.0
Test: Rhodopsin Protein
Loop Time < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 48.56 |==================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 910.89 |=================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 538.78 |=================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 288.34 |=================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 1452.47 |================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 1211.40 |================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 1063.46 |================================================


Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 2503.37 |================================================


Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.3
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 109.62 |=================================================


C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 35.71 |==================================================


FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.1
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 5.16 |===================================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 26542.73 |===============================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 1437.08 |================================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 2237.56 |================================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 88176.93 |===============================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 230.60 |=================================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 92616.16 |===============================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 2040.29 |================================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 2013.67 |================================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 26052.29 |===============================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 30322.09 |===============================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 27238.34 |===============================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 258.91 |=================================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 2857.98 |================================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 257.13 |=================================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 75032.98 |===============================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 80964.31 |===============================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 3486.69 |================================================


PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 4121.27 |================================================


Redis 3.0.1
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 2449002.50 |=============================================


Redis 3.0.1
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 1993383.67 |=============================================


Redis 3.0.1
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 1931823.29 |=============================================


Redis 3.0.1
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 2375573.00 |=============================================


Redis 3.0.1
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 1797687.71 |=============================================


Apache Benchmark 2.4.7
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i5-6600K . 62657.61 |===============================================