Scaling R9 Fury Linux 4.6 Mesa 11.3

Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 testing with a MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0 and Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MB on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1605193-HA-SCALINGR989
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Radeon R9 Fury
May 18 2016
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Scaling R9 Fury Linux 4.6 Mesa 11.3OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores)MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0Intel Sky Lake16384MB120GB Samsung SSD 850Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MBRealtek ALC1150DELL P2415QIntel ConnectionUbuntu 16.044.6.0-040600-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.18.3modesetting 1.18.34.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4OpenCL 1.1 MESA 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA)GCC 5.3.1 20160413ext43840x2160ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLOpenCLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionScaling R9 Fury Linux 4.6 Mesa 11.3 BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- GLAMOR

Scaling R9 Fury Linux 4.6 Mesa 11.3csgo: 800 x 600csgo: 1024 x 768csgo: 1600 x 900csgo: 1280 x 1024csgo: 1600 x 1200csgo: 1920 x 1080csgo: 1920 x 1200csgo: 2048 x 1280csgo: 2560 x 1440csgo: 3840 x 2160tesseract: 800 x 600tesseract: 1024 x 768tesseract: 1600 x 900tesseract: 1280 x 1024tesseract: 1600 x 1200tesseract: 1920 x 1080tesseract: 1920 x 1200tesseract: 2048 x 1280tesseract: 2560 x 1440tesseract: 3840 x 2160tf2: 800 x 600tf2: 1024 x 768tf2: 1600 x 900tf2: 1280 x 1024tf2: 1600 x 1200tf2: 1920 x 1080tf2: 1920 x 1200tf2: 2048 x 1280tf2: 2560 x 1440tf2: 3840 x 2160unigine-valley: 800 x 600 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 1024 x 768 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 1600 x 900 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 1280 x 1024 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 1600 x 1200 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 2048 x 1280 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 3840 x 2160 - FullscreenRadeon R9 Fury148.74149.80142.72149.50150.60144.81146.86150.43142.35132.62272.31266.35248.66252.36239.35235.35230.71229.70209.17162.48125.62125.02119.40123.77122.30119.80119.72121.09117.90115.1399.8599.9393.42100.8587.0882.0277.3969.9051.9422.28OpenBenchmarking.org

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 800 x 600Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.20, N = 3148.74

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1024 x 768Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.37, N = 3149.80

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1600 x 900Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.25, N = 3142.72

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1280 x 1024Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.34, N = 3149.50

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1600 x 1200Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.51, N = 3150.60

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1920 x 1080Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.65, N = 3144.81

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1920 x 1200Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.36, N = 3146.86

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 2048 x 1280Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.41, N = 3150.43

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 2560 x 1440Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.61, N = 3142.35

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 3840 x 2160Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.15, N = 3132.62

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 800 x 600Radeon R9 Fury60120180240300SE +/- 0.82, N = 3272.31

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1024 x 768Radeon R9 Fury60120180240300SE +/- 0.75, N = 3266.35

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1600 x 900Radeon R9 Fury50100150200250SE +/- 0.90, N = 3248.66

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1280 x 1024Radeon R9 Fury60120180240300SE +/- 1.75, N = 3252.36

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1600 x 1200Radeon R9 Fury50100150200250SE +/- 2.18, N = 3239.35

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Radeon R9 Fury50100150200250SE +/- 2.08, N = 3235.35

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1200Radeon R9 Fury50100150200250SE +/- 0.86, N = 3230.71

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2048 x 1280Radeon R9 Fury50100150200250SE +/- 0.91, N = 3229.70

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440Radeon R9 Fury50100150200250SE +/- 0.99, N = 3209.17

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160Radeon R9 Fury4080120160200SE +/- 0.33, N = 3162.48

Team Fortress 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 800 x 600Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.79, N = 3125.62

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1024 x 768Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.23, N = 3125.02

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1600 x 900Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 1.03, N = 3119.40

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1280 x 1024Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.44, N = 3123.77

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1600 x 1200Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.62, N = 3122.30

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.15, N = 3119.80

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1920 x 1200Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.40, N = 3119.72

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 2048 x 1280Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 1.12, N = 3121.09

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 2560 x 1440Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.58, N = 3117.90

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160Radeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.43, N = 3115.13

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 Fury20406080100SE +/- 0.09, N = 399.85

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 Fury20406080100SE +/- 0.17, N = 399.93

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 Fury20406080100SE +/- 0.14, N = 393.42

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 Fury20406080100SE +/- 0.19, N = 3100.85

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 Fury20406080100SE +/- 0.21, N = 387.08

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 Fury20406080100SE +/- 0.02, N = 382.02

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 Fury20406080100SE +/- 0.11, N = 377.39

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 2048 x 1280 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 Fury1632486480SE +/- 0.02, N = 369.90

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 Fury1224364860SE +/- 0.02, N = 351.94

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 Fury510152025SE +/- 0.01, N = 322.28