2016-03-15-1927
Intel Celeron 3.06GHz testing with a Intel D102GGC2 and Sapphire NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS 256MB on LinuxMint 17.3 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Realtek RTL-8100 - Intel Celeron 3.06GHz: 

	Processor: Intel Celeron 3.06GHz @ 3.07GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: Intel D102GGC2, Chipset: AMD RS400, Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 160GB Seagate ST3160813AS + 80GB Seagate ST380020ACE, Graphics: Sapphire NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS 256MB (459/400MHz), Audio: AMD IXP SB4x0 HD Audio, Network: Realtek RTL-8100/8101L/8139

	OS: LinuxMint 17.3, Kernel: 3.19.0-32-generic (i686), Desktop: Cinnamon 2.8.6, Display Server: X Server 1.17.1, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.11, OpenGL: 3.3.0, Compiler: GCC 4.8, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x900


Loopback TCP Network Performance
Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Realtek RTL-8100 - Intel Celeron 3.06GHz . 122.82 |============================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Realtek RTL-8100 - Intel Celeron 3.06GHz . 292.81 |============================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Realtek RTL-8100 - Intel Celeron 3.06GHz . 56.71 |=============================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Realtek RTL-8100 - Intel Celeron 3.06GHz . 252.84 |============================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Realtek RTL-8100 - Intel Celeron 3.06GHz . 344.45 |============================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Realtek RTL-8100 - Intel Celeron 3.06GHz . 383.68 |============================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Realtek RTL-8100 - Intel Celeron 3.06GHz . 426.37 |============================