Core 2 Duo multicore
Running pts/compress-7zip-1.6.0, pts/compress-pbzip2-1.3.0, pts/x264-1.3.1, pts/openssl-1.6.0, pts/john-the-ripper-1.3.0, pts/himeno-1.1.0, pts/c-ray-1.1.0, pts/povray-1.0.0, pts/smallpt-1.0.1, pts/crafty-1.3.0, pts/hmmer-1.1.0, pts/mafft-1.4.0, pts/minion-1.3.0, pts/npb-1.0.0, pts/build-php-1.3.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Core 2 Duo multicore: 

	Processor: Intel Core 2 6600 @ 2.31GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: American Megatrends P2.30, Chipset: VIA PT880 Ultra/PT894, Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 40GB Western Digital WD400JB-00EN, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 1024MB (550/400MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888, Network: VIA VT6102

	OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic-pae (i686), Desktop: Unity 5.10.0, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 295.40, OpenGL: 3.3.0 NVIDIA 295.40, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768

FX-6300 multicore comparison2: 

	Processor: AMD FX-6300 Six-Core @ 3.50GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3, Chipset: AMD RD890 bridge, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 240GB Seagate ST240HM000 + 500GB Western Digital WD5002AALX-0, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 2048MB (901/891MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC889, Monitor: Samsung S24B20/S24B30, Network: Intel 82574L Gigabit Connection

	OS: LinuxMint 17, Kernel: 3.13.0-24-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 2.2.16, Display Server: X Server 1.15.1, Display Driver: NVIDIA 331.38, OpenGL: 4.3.0, Compiler: GCC 4.8.2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080


7-Zip Compression 9.20.1
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 3186  |=========
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 14695 |========================================


Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.0.5
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 47.80 |========================================
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 11.00 |=========


x264 2011-12-06
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 22.79 |=================================================


OpenSSL 1.0.0e
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 14.70 |=================================================


John The Ripper 1.7.9
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 1100 |===========
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 4199 |=========================================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.12
Operation: Local Adaptive Thresholding
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 20 |====================================================


GraphicsMagick 1.3.12
Operation: Resizing
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 51 |====================================================


Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 645.23 |=====================================
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 674.87 |=======================================


C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 427.25 |=======================================
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 39.61  |====


POV-Ray 3.6.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore . 1076 |==================================================


Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 702 |==========================================
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 145 |=========


Crafty 23.4
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 0.01   |
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 100.68 |=======================================


Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 66.44 |========================================
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 16.89 |==========


Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864
Multiple Sequence Alignment
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 29.03 |========================================
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 8.28  |===========


Minion 0.12
Benchmark: Quasigroup
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 307.93 |=======================================
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 187.23 |========================


Minion 0.12
Benchmark: Solitaire
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 216.63 |=======================================
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 141.17 |=========================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: EP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 30.11  |=========
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 132.68 |=======================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: IS.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 72.79  |========================
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 116.16 |=======================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: LU.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 1563.40 |=======
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 8327.63 |======================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: UA.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 5.65  |=========
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 26.58 |========================================


Timed PHP Compilation 5.2.9
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core 2 Duo multicore .......... 110.20 |=======================================
FX-6300 multicore comparison2 . 41.67  |===============