Radeon R9 290 Linux

Intel Core i7-4790K testing with a ASRock Z97 Extreme6 and Supported device 67B1 4096MB on Ubuntu 14.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1408229-KH-RADEONR9219
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Supported device 67B1
August 22 2014
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Radeon R9 290 LinuxOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores)ASRock Z97 Extreme6Intel 4th Gen Core DRAM16384MB128GB Crucial_CT128MX1Supported device 67B1 4096MB (947/1250MHz)Realtek ALC1150SyncMasterIntel ConnectionUbuntu 14.043.13.0-34-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.2.2X Server 1.15.1fglrx 14.20.74.4.12967GCC 4.8.2ext42560x1600ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionRadeon R9 290 Linux BenchmarksSystem Logs- LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri - Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand

Radeon R9 290 Linuxtesseract: 800 x 600tesseract: 1024 x 768tesseract: 1280 x 800tesseract: 1280 x 960tesseract: 1440 x 900tesseract: 1280 x 1024tesseract: 1400 x 1050tesseract: 1600 x 1200tesseract: 1680 x 1050tesseract: 1920 x 1080tesseract: 1920 x 1200tesseract: 2560 x 1600warsow: 800 x 600warsow: 1024 x 768warsow: 1280 x 800warsow: 1280 x 960warsow: 1440 x 900warsow: 1280 x 1024warsow: 1400 x 1050warsow: 1600 x 1200warsow: 1680 x 1050warsow: 1920 x 1080warsow: 1920 x 1200warsow: 2560 x 1600xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Lowxonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Lowxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highxonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Highxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraxonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Ultraxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimatexonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Ultimategputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080gputest: GiMark - 2560 x 1600gputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080gputest: Plot3D - 2560 x 1600gputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080gputest: Furmark - 2560 x 1600gputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080gputest: TessMark - 2560 x 1600gputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080gputest: Triangle - 2560 x 1600gputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080gputest: Pixmark Piano - 2560 x 1600gputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080gputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 2560 x 1600Supported device 67B1314.86305.68304.33300.30297.78295.71289.09274.11282.52269.98258.72191.99215.70215.57215.63215.87215.70215.87215.60215.80216.03215.60215.67215.53391.63394.40289.35279.33253.86240.94179.14164.92359635966383863767286728844835483529703829688548248214991498OpenBenchmarking.org

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 800 x 600Supported device 67B170140210280350SE +/- 0.53, N = 3314.86

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1024 x 768Supported device 67B170140210280350SE +/- 0.99, N = 3305.68

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1280 x 800Supported device 67B170140210280350SE +/- 0.91, N = 3304.33

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1280 x 960Supported device 67B170140210280350SE +/- 2.35, N = 3300.30

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1440 x 900Supported device 67B160120180240300SE +/- 1.14, N = 3297.78

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1280 x 1024Supported device 67B160120180240300SE +/- 2.55, N = 3295.71

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1400 x 1050Supported device 67B160120180240300SE +/- 1.04, N = 3289.09

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1600 x 1200Supported device 67B160120180240300SE +/- 2.85, N = 3274.11

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1680 x 1050Supported device 67B160120180240300SE +/- 2.54, N = 3282.52

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Supported device 67B160120180240300SE +/- 3.68, N = 3269.98

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1200Supported device 67B160120180240300SE +/- 1.44, N = 3258.72

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1600Supported device 67B14080120160200SE +/- 1.54, N = 3191.99

Warsow

This is a benchmark of Warsow, a popular open-source first-person shooter. This game uses the QFusion engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 800 x 600Supported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.23, N = 3215.70

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 1024 x 768Supported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.12, N = 3215.57

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 1280 x 800Supported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.13, N = 3215.63

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 1280 x 960Supported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.23, N = 3215.87

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 1440 x 900Supported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.31, N = 3215.70

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 1280 x 1024Supported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.07, N = 3215.87

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 1400 x 1050Supported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.15, N = 3215.60

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 1600 x 1200Supported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.17, N = 3215.80

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 1680 x 1050Supported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.03, N = 3216.03

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 1920 x 1080Supported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.12, N = 3215.60

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 1920 x 1200Supported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.12, N = 3215.67

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 2560 x 1600Supported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.09, N = 3215.53

Xonotic

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowSupported device 67B180160240320400SE +/- 0.31, N = 3391.63MIN: 245 / MAX: 926

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: LowSupported device 67B190180270360450SE +/- 1.01, N = 3394.40MIN: 255 / MAX: 930

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighSupported device 67B160120180240300SE +/- 1.00, N = 3289.35MIN: 115 / MAX: 704

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: HighSupported device 67B160120180240300SE +/- 0.49, N = 3279.33MIN: 101 / MAX: 593

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraSupported device 67B160120180240300SE +/- 0.61, N = 3253.86MIN: 106 / MAX: 638

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: UltraSupported device 67B150100150200250SE +/- 0.29, N = 3240.94MIN: 81 / MAX: 541

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateSupported device 67B14080120160200SE +/- 0.15, N = 3179.14MIN: 28 / MAX: 588

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: UltimateSupported device 67B14080120160200SE +/- 0.24, N = 3164.92MIN: 32 / MAX: 459

GpuTest

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Supported device 67B18001600240032004000SE +/- 0.33, N = 33596

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1600Supported device 67B18001600240032004000SE +/- 0.33, N = 33596

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Supported device 67B114K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 110.82, N = 363838

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1600Supported device 67B114K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 101.93, N = 363767

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Supported device 67B16001200180024003000SE +/- 10.12, N = 32867

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1600Supported device 67B16001200180024003000SE +/- 26.50, N = 32884

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Supported device 67B110002000300040005000SE +/- 0.33, N = 34835

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1600Supported device 67B110002000300040005000SE +/- 0.33, N = 34835

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Supported device 67B160K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 33.03, N = 3297038

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1600Supported device 67B160K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 35.26, N = 3296885

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Supported device 67B1100200300400500SE +/- 0.00, N = 3482

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1600Supported device 67B1100200300400500SE +/- 0.00, N = 3482

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Supported device 67B130060090012001500SE +/- 0.00, N = 31499

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1600Supported device 67B130060090012001500SE +/- 0.00, N = 31498