Intel Xeon E5-2609 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 testing with a Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF v0123456789 and Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Comparatif Intel E5 #1: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF v0123456789, Chipset: Intel Sandy Bridge DMI2, Memory: 4 x 8192 MB DDR3-1066MHz Samsung, Disk: 2000GB Western Digital WD2001FASS-0, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450, Network: Intel 10 Gigabit X540-AT2 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-39-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 Comparatif Intel E5 #2: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF v0123456789, Chipset: Intel Sandy Bridge DMI2, Memory: 4 x 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz Samsung, Disk: 2000GB Western Digital WD2001FASS-0, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450, Network: Intel 10 Gigabit X540-AT2 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-39-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 Comparatif Intel E5 #3: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF v0123456789, Chipset: Intel Sandy Bridge DMI2, Memory: 4 x 8192 MB DDR3-1600MHz Samsung, Disk: 2000GB Western Digital WD2001FASS-0, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450, Network: Intel 10 Gigabit X540-AT2 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-40-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 20.47 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 20.37 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 20.43 |=============================================== BlogBench 1.0 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 1320263 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 1300092 |============================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 1279039 |============================================ TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.2z Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 16.57 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 17.31 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 17.42 |=============================================== VP8 libvpx Encoding 1.1.0 vpxenc Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 24.07 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 20.21 |======================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 19.71 |====================================== x264 2013-01-28 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 138.85 |============================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 189.94 |========================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 210.83 |============================================== GMPbench 0.2 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 2121.40 |======================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 2206.40 |======================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 2473.90 |============================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.16 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 54 |========================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 90 |========================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 108 |================================================= Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 8037.63 |===================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 8389.62 |======================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 9658.30 |============================================= BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Floating-Point Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 1 |=================================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 1 |=================================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 1 |=================================================== AIO-Stress 0.21 Test: Random Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 1646.46 |====================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 1826.84 |=========================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 1926.95 |============================================= Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 256 MB/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 108.64 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 102.39 |=========================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 100.01 |========================================== IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 6325.51 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 5405.73 |====================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 5840.62 |========================================== IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 85.38 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 86.79 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 86.99 |=============================================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Random Read - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 32 MB/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 7599.96 |========================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 7598.45 |========================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 8252.82 |============================================= Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 458.82 |=========================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 455.99 |=========================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 493.19 |============================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 17743.71 |=================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 19869.93 |======================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 22364.09 |============================================ RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 15124.50 |===================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 16261.81 |======================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 18087.99 |============================================ Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 23210.08 |================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 30703.03 |======================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 56886.16 |============================================ CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 11733.15 |===================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 12316.60 |======================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 13938.42 |============================================ Botan 1.10.3 Test: X9.19-MAC Mbytes/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 47.58 |======================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 49.03 |========================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 55.52 |=============================================== FFTE 5.0 Test: N=64, 1D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 3371.41 |======================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 3510.18 |========================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 3900.19 |============================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 1947.63 |==================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 2066.77 |====================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 2454.81 |============================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 1454.21 |====================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 1521.65 |======================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 1706.67 |============================================= Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 965.60 |======================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 1003.10 |======================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 1121.67 |============================================= 7-Zip Compression 9.20.1 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 18362 |==================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 32874 |==================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 42753 |=============================================== TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 344537 |======================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 359140 |========================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 400346 |============================================== John The Ripper 1.7.9-jumbo-7 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 4560 |================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 9393 |================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 12842 |=============================================== NGINX Benchmark 1.0.11 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 18511.10 |====================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 19202.21 |======================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 21705.75 |============================================ Apache Benchmark 2.4.3 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 20998.79 |============================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 16290.14 |================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 16885.02 |=================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 59978 |========================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 62443 |========================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 69461 |=============================================== OpenSSL 1.0.1c RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 74.73 |======================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 77.53 |========================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 86.73 |=============================================== CLOMP 3.3 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 2.88 |========================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 3.38 |================================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 3.20 |============================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: SP.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 1278.50 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 936.64 |================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 998.76 |=================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 3205 |========================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 3378 |============================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 3694 |================================================ BLAKE2 20121223 Phoronix Test Suite v4.4.1 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 5.93 |================================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 4.75 |====================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 3.95 |================================ LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 1.0 Test: Rhodopsin Protein Loop Time < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 65.88 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 63.77 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 56.46 |======================================== PyBench 2008-08-14 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 3124 |================================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 2997 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 2675 |========================================= Flexible IO Tester 1.57 Test: Example Network Job Seconds (Run Time) < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 7.44 |======================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 8.98 |================================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 8.58 |============================================== Flexible IO Tester 1.57 Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern Seconds (Run Time) < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 3294.71 |=========================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 3282.77 |========================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 3487.98 |============================================= SQLite 3.7.3 Test Target: /tmp [/dev/sda6] Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 1071.55 |=========================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 1054.72 |========================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 1117.98 |============================================= SQLite 3.7.3 Test Target: Default Test Directory Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 1510.46 |========================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 1643.16 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 1565.79 |=========================================== Unpacking The Linux Kernel linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 14.07 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 14.39 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 13.66 |============================================= Loopback TCP Network Performance Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 24.68 |======================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 29.58 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 29.15 |============================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: Two-Point Angular Correlation Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 2320.22 |==================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 2573.68 |======================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 2864.11 |============================================= Rodinia 2.2 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 81.82 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 69.18 |======================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 42.11 |======================== Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 39.71 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 38.23 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 34.29 |========================================= Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 12.31 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 12.90 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 12.18 |============================================ Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 6.22 |================================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 5.73 |============================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 5.74 |============================================ Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.1.2 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 23.42 |=============================================== Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 29.56 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 27.87 |============================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 25.26 |======================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.8.1-10 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 56.23 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 40.00 |================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 32.67 |=========================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 81.54 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 51.12 |============================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 38.85 |====================== Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.0-rc3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 47.82 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 35.45 |=================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 28.48 |============================ Timed PHP Compilation 5.2.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 33.42 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 24.42 |================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 20.63 |============================= C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 37.74 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 27.04 |================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 19.43 |======================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.6 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 7.96 |================================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 4.48 |=========================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 3.32 |==================== Open Porous Media 2012-10-26 OPM Benchmark: Upscale-Relperm Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 181.78 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 181.42 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 152.90 |======================================= Primesieve 4.2 1e12 Prime Number Generation Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 75.39 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 46.18 |============================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 33.45 |===================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 101 |================================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 50 |======================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 37 |================== Gzip Compression 2GB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 18.70 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 18.07 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 16.15 |========================================= LZMA Compression 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 203.30 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 182.79 |========================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 162.38 |===================================== Crafty 23.4 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 121.47 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 116.31 |============================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 103.79 |======================================= dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 97.26 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 93.34 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 83.53 |======================================== Monkey Audio Encoding 3.99u4b5s6 WAV To APE Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 9.15 |================================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 8.81 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 7.90 |========================================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.2.1 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 9.56 |================================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 9.24 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 8.27 |========================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 22.09 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 21.35 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 18.96 |======================================== Ogg Encoding 1.3.0 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 12.61 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 12.13 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 10.86 |======================================== WavPack Audio Encoding 4.41.0 WAV To WavPack Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 14.97 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 14.41 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 12.86 |======================================== eSpeak Speech Engine 1.40.02 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 62.92 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 60.86 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 54.32 |========================================= FFmpeg 1.1 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 25.10 |====================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 30.02 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 31.22 |=============================================== GnuPG 1.4.10 1GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 13.70 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 13.12 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 11.72 |======================================== Mencoder 1.1 AVI To LAVC Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 35.80 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 34.25 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 30.62 |======================================== Minion 0.15 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 137.35 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 134.30 |============================================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 120.86 |======================================== N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 43.71 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 21.54 |======================= Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 15.51 |================= Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 725.48 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 699.55 |============================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 625.41 |======================================== POV-Ray 3.6.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 1075 |================================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 1040 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 923 |========================================= Sample Pi Program Phoronix Test Suite v4.4.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 5.66 |================================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 5.46 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 4.90 |========================================== Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 33.19 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 32.60 |============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 29.50 |========================================== Tachyon 0.98.9 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 13.30 |=============================================== Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 7.50 |=========================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 5.45 |=================== Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better Comparatif Intel E5 #1 . 4.92 |================================================ Comparatif Intel E5 #2 . 2.22 |====================== Comparatif Intel E5 #3 . 1.78 |=================