nexenta-nfs
2 x Intel Xeon L5640 testing with a Supermicro X8DTT v2.0 and Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


nfs over nexenta: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon L5640 @ 2.27GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X8DTT v2.0, Chipset: Intel 5500 I/O + ICH10R, Memory: 12 x 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz Samsung, Disk: 2 x 500GB Western Digital WD5003ABYX-0, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450, Network: Intel 82576 Gigabit Connection

	OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-36-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768


Flexible IO Tester 1.57
Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern
Seconds (Run Time) < Lower Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 2276.49 |===================================================


SQLite 3.7.3
12,500 INSERTs
Seconds < Lower Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 99.06 |=====================================================


FS-Mark 3.3
1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 38.17 |=====================================================


Dbench 4.0
12 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 55.91 |=====================================================


Dbench 4.0
48 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 83.47 |=====================================================


Dbench 4.0
128 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 89.54 |=====================================================


Dbench 4.0
1 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 18.31 |=====================================================


IOzone 3.405
8GB Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 101.98 |====================================================


IOzone 3.405
8GB Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 89.90 |=====================================================


Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Random Read - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 5836.20 |===================================================


Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Random Write - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 9.11 |======================================================


Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Compile
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 24.16 |=====================================================


Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Initial Create
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 4.26 |======================================================


Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Read Compiled Tree
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 25.45 |=====================================================


Unpacking The Linux Kernel
linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 154.26 |====================================================


PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 140 |=======================================================


Gzip Compression
2GB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
nfs over nexenta . 20.10 |=====================================================