HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 testing with a HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8 and Matrox s MGA G200EH on Debian testing via the Phoronix Test Suite. ml350p umons: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.29GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8, Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 8 x 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz, Disk: 2 x 2000GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200EH, Monitor: HP 2011, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe OS: Debian testing, Kernel: 3.2.0-3-amd64 (x86_64), Display Driver: vesa 2.3.1, Compiler: GCC 4.7, File-System: ext4 alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2: Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.67GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS P5Q-PRO, Chipset: Intel 4 DRAM + ICH10R, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 320GB Western Digital WD3200AAKS-0 + 2 x 200GB Western Digital WD2000JD-22H, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS 512MB (567/500MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1200, Network: Atheros AR8121/AR8113/AR8114 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-29-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 2D 5.14.0, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 295.40, OpenGL: 3.3.0 NVIDIA 295.40, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 AIO-Stress 0.21 Random Write MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons . 2070.79 |======================================================= Flexible IO Tester 1.57 Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern Seconds (Run Time) < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 1725.61 |============== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 5370.18 |============================================ SQLite 3.7.3 12,500 INSERTs Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons . 6.44 |========================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 177.22 |============================================= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 14.90 |==== Dbench 4.0 12 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 3810.92 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 18.20 | Dbench 4.0 48 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 4831.62 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 23.23 | Dbench 4.0 128 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 3662.54 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 18.65 | Dbench 4.0 1 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 676.58 |============================================= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 9.93 |= IOzone 3.405 8GB Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 5703.69 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 118.27 |= IOzone 3.405 8GB Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 138.39 |============================================= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 65.45 |===================== IOzone 3.405 Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 4809.99 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 3517.15 |================================ IOzone 3.405 Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 142.45 |============================================= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 65.59 |===================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Random Read - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 13915.65 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 4429.64 |============== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Random Write - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 45.13 |============================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 3.18 |=== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 819.41 |============================================= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 49.96 |=== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 201.14 |============================================= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 74.41 |================= Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 532.17 |============================================= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 399.47 |================================== Unpacking The Linux Kernel linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2 Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 11.71 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 12.34 |============================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Integer Add MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 25813.40 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 4434.87 |======= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Integer Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 22578.70 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 4518.21 |========= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Integer Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 22162.05 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 4519.08 |========= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Floating-Point Add MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 25650.20 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 5091.40 |========= Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 65511.11 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 4691.34 |=== Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 60757.28 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 4452.93 |=== Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 56249.49 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 5053.79 |==== Stream 2009-04-11 Add MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 54712.99 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 4841.35 |==== Stream 2009-04-11 Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 65511.11 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 4691.34 |=== Stream 2009-04-11 Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 60757.28 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 4452.93 |=== Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 54712.99 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 4841.35 |==== Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 9.91 |==================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 22.99 |============================================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 4.85 |================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 12.51 |============================================== GMPbench 0.2 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 2475.20 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 1632.30 |============================= Java SciMark 2.0 FFT Performance Mflops > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 774.20 |============================================= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 522.03 |============================== Java SciMark 2.0 SOR Performance Mflops > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 1171.58 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 1054.13 |======================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Composite Performance Mflops > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 1253.83 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 888.67 |=============================== Java SciMark 2.0 Monte Carlo Performance Mflops > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 603.48 |============================================= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 454.40 |================================== Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 16.54 |======================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 31.26 |============================================== Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 9248.43 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 7874.63 |===================================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 18492687.80 |======================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 15623996.53 |================================== CacheBench Read Cache MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 2355.08 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 2242.82 |========================================== CacheBench Write Cache MB/s > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 10464.44 |=========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 9864.69 |========================================= SciMark 2.0 Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 903.20 |============================================= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 623.93 |=============================== John The Ripper 1.7.9 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 10842 |============================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 2920 |============ x264 2011-12-06 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 205.67 |============================================= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 64.22 |============== GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 151 |================================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 105 |================================= Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 1177.42 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 938.89 |=================================== 7-Zip Compression 9.20.1 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 38731 |============================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 8787 |========== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 46.87 |============= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 157.14 |============================================= Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.0-rc3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 33.38 |=================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 81.44 |============================================== Timed PHP Compilation 5.2.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 20.30 |=================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 49.39 |============================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 17.51 |========== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 78.70 |============================================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.0.5 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 4.10 |============== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 13.18 |============================================== Gzip Compression 2GB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 16.00 |============================================ alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 16.84 |============================================== LZMA Compression 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 174.99 |===================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 213.15 |============================================= Crafty 23.4 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 103.39 |===================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 125.22 |============================================= dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 79.73 |================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 104.15 |============================================= Monkey Audio Encoding 3.99u4b5s6 WAV To APE Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 7.78 |============================= alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 12.28 |============================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.2.1 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 7.95 |================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 10.83 |============================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 19.17 |==================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 24.77 |============================================== Ogg Encoding 1.3.0 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons . 10.86 |========================================================= WavPack Audio Encoding 4.41.0 WAV To WavPack Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons . 12.80 |========================================================= eSpeak Speech Engine 1.40.02 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 53.75 |======================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 61.63 |============================================== FFmpeg 0.10 AVI To NTSC VCD Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 14.27 |====================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 17.32 |============================================== GnuPG 1.4.10 1GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 11.69 |======================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 13.45 |============================================== Minion 0.12 Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 160.63 |========================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 172.99 |============================================= Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 630.31 |====================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 739.22 |============================================= POV-Ray 3.6.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 891 |===================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 1139 |=============================================== Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 28.82 |======================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 33.53 |============================================== OpenSSL 1.0.0e RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 65.73 |============================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 39.38 |============================ NGINX Benchmark 1.0.11 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ml350p umons . 22070.91 |====================================================== Apache Benchmark 2.2.21 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ml350p umons . 22592.51 |====================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better ml350p umons ............ 85693 |============================================== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 56946 |=============================== Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better ml350p umons ............ 2.09 |============== alf_q9540_vs_e5-2630_v2 . 6.95 |===============================================