Intel Ivy Bridge Power Usage Intel Core i7-3770K Ivy Bridge benchmarking with Intel Z77 motherboard under Ubuntu Linux when testing the Linux 3.2, 3.4, and 3.5 kernels looking for any power regressions. Benchmarking by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1207314-SU-INTELIVYB61 .
Intel Ivy Bridge Power Usage Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Linux 3.2 Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz (8 Cores) ECS Z77H2-A2X v1.0 Intel Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd 8192MB 240GB OCZ VERTEX3 Intel Ivybridge Desktop (GT2) Realtek ALC892 DELL P2210H Realtek RTL8111/8168B + Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 Ubuntu 12.10 3.2.0-030200-generic (x86_64) Unity 6.0.0 X Server 1.12.1.902 (1.12.2 RC 2) intel 2.19.0 2.1 Mesa 8.0.3 GCC 4.7 ext4 1920x1080 3.4.0-030400-generic (x86_64) 3.0 Mesa 8.0.3 3.5.0-030500-generic (x86_64) OpenBenchmarking.org Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,c++,go,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-arch-32=i686 --with-tune=generic -v Processor Details - Scaling Governor: ondemand Graphics Details - UXA System Details - Compiz was running on this system.
Intel Ivy Bridge Power Usage c-ray: Total Time build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile npb: EP.B xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Low xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - High nexuiz: 1920 x 1080 - Yes - On openarena: 1920 x 1080 pgbench: TPC-B Transactions Per Second Linux 3.2 Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 33.35 86.80 274.74 25.73 3174.24 33.28 86.73 272.68 111.10 48.43 38.98 28.07 3149.61 33.40 86.52 273.40 111.65 49.02 40.03 62.38 3121.48 OpenBenchmarking.org
C-Ray Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Linux 3.2 Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 33.35 33.28 33.40 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3
C-Ray Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Linux 3.2 Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 0.6975 1.395 2.0925 2.79 3.4875 3.09 3.10 3.07
C-Ray System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Linux 3.2 100.7 102.9 104.4 Linux 3.4 100.4 103.1 104.4 Linux 3.5 101.0 102.7 104.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 Time To Compile Linux 3.2 Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 SE +/- 0.61, N = 3 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 86.80 86.73 86.52
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 Time To Compile Linux 3.2 Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 0.288 0.576 0.864 1.152 1.44 1.25 1.25 1.28
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Linux 3.2 47.0 108.4 118.4 Linux 3.4 44.5 108.8 118.4 Linux 3.5 63.7 110.9 118.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 System Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.B OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: EP.B Linux 3.2 Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.57, N = 3 SE +/- 2.43, N = 3 SE +/- 2.34, N = 3 274.74 272.68 273.40 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -fopenmp
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.B OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: EP.B Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 0.5873 1.1746 1.7619 2.3492 2.9365 2.61 2.55
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Linux 3.4 96.1 104.3 107.7 Linux 3.5 105.9 107.1 108.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.6 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 111.10 111.65
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.6 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 0.3105 0.621 0.9315 1.242 1.5525 1.38 1.37
Xonotic System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Linux 3.4 62.6 80.4 83.0 Linux 3.5 73.9 81.3 94.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.6 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.6 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 48.43 49.02
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.6 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 0.1485 0.297 0.4455 0.594 0.7425 0.65 0.66
Xonotic System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Linux 3.4 57.5 74.6 79.3 Linux 3.5 42.3 74.2 76.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.6 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Nexuiz Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: On OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: On Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 38.98 40.03
Nexuiz Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: On OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: On Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 0.135 0.27 0.405 0.54 0.675 0.53 0.60
Nexuiz System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Linux 3.4 68.6 73.5 75.5 Linux 3.5 38.2 67.3 76.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenArena Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Linux 3.2 Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 20.72, N = 6 25.73 28.07 62.38
OpenArena Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Linux 3.2 Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 0.1958 0.3916 0.5874 0.7832 0.979 0.37 0.38 0.87
OpenArena System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Linux 3.2 63.2 70.4 72.4 Linux 3.4 59.5 73.1 75.1 Linux 3.5 40.3 71.5 75.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
PostgreSQL pgbench TPC-B Transactions Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 8.4.11 TPC-B Transactions Per Second Linux 3.2 Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 4.58, N = 3 SE +/- 13.13, N = 3 SE +/- 33.20, N = 3 3174.24 3149.61 3121.48 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -lpgport -lpq -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench TPC-B Transactions Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org TPS Per Watt, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 8.4.11 TPC-B Transactions Per Second Linux 3.2 Linux 3.4 Linux 3.5 13 26 39 52 65 59.33 57.94 56.35
PostgreSQL pgbench System Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Linux 3.2 39.6 53.5 62.8 Linux 3.4 39.5 54.4 63.2 Linux 3.5 39.5 55.4 63.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 8.4.11 System Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
System Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Min Avg Max Linux 3.2 39.6 77.5 118.4 Linux 3.4 39.5 74.6 118.4 Linux 3.5 38.2 75.1 118.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts System Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 40 80 120 160 200
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4