test2
Intel Core 2 Duo U9400 testing with a TOSHIBA Portable PC and Intel Mobile 4 IGP on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


RunCore 32G-C - Intel Core 2 Duo U9400: 

	Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo U9400 @ 1.40GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: TOSHIBA Portable PC, Chipset: Intel Mobile 4 MCH + ICH9M-E, Memory: 3072MB, Disk: 32GB RunCore 32G-C, Graphics: Intel Mobile 4 IGP, Audio: Realtek ALC262, Network: Intel 82567LM Gigabit Connection + Intel WiFi Link 5100

	OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-27-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.4.1, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: intel 2.19.0, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x800


PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
RunCore 32G-C - Intel Core 2 Duo U9400 . 337 |=================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
RunCore 32G-C - Intel Core 2 Duo U9400 . 2122.11 |=============================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
RunCore 32G-C - Intel Core 2 Duo U9400 . 2301.50 |=============================


C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RunCore 32G-C - Intel Core 2 Duo U9400 . 444.55 |==============================


Apache Benchmark 2.2.21
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
RunCore 32G-C - Intel Core 2 Duo U9400 . 4599.12 |=============================