VM Versus Meta Disk Performance

Xen HVM domU 4.0.2_02-4.9.2 testing on CentOS 6.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1207204-BY-DISKVMLOG37.

VM Versus Meta Disk PerformanceProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelCompilerFile-SystemSystem LayerScreen Resolutionxen_guestxen_dom04 x Intel Xeon E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4 Cores)Xen HVM domUIntel 440FX- 82441FX PMC2048MB21GB QEMU HDDCirrus Logic GD 5446Realtek RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+CentOS 6.02.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 (x86_64)GCC 4.4.4 20100726ext4Xen HVM domU 4.0.2_02-4.9.2Intel Xeon E5620 @ 1.60GHz (16 Cores)Supermicro X8DTUIntel 5520 I/O + ICH10R18432MB500GB Seagate ST9500530NS + 1999GB MR9260-8iMatrox MGA G200eW WPCM450Intel 82576 Gigabit ConnectionopenSUSE 11.4 (x86_64)2.6.37.6-0.7-xen (x86_64)GCC 4.51280x1024OpenBenchmarking.orgCompiler Details- xen_guest: --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-dssi --disable-libjava-multilib --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-java-maintainer-mode --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada --enable-libgcj-multifile --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=i686 --with-cloog --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0/jre --with-ppl --with-tune=generic - xen_dom0: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-plugin --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-checking=release --enable-gold --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,ada --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=i586 --with-plugin-ld=/usr/bin/gold --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-system-libunwind System Details- xen_guest: SELinux: Enabled.- xen_dom0: Disk Scheduler: CFQ.Disk Mount Options Details- xen_guest: barrier=1,data=ordered,relatime,rw,seclabelDisk Details- xen_dom0: CFQ / acl,barrier=1,data=ordered,relatime,rw,user_xattr

VM Versus Meta Disk Performancefs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizefs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSyncfs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threadsfs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizexen_guestxen_dom09.7715.0015.401005.3732.7315.80OpenBenchmarking.org

FS-Mark

Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizexen_guestxen_dom048121620SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 39.8715.401. (CC) gcc options: -static

FS-Mark

Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSyncxen_guestxen_dom02004006008001000SE +/- 0.77, N = 6SE +/- 12.11, N = 318.101005.371. (CC) gcc options: -static

FS-Mark

Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threadsxen_dom0816243240SE +/- 0.32, N = 332.73

FS-Mark

Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizexen_dom048121620SE +/- 0.06, N = 315.80

Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4