medion_amd+geforce AMD Athlon XP 2000+ testing with a MSI MS-6738 and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. amb+geforce: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 495MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 (249/333MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 nvdia: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB (324/551MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.5 Mesa 8.0.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 nvidia5600: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB (324/551MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.5 Mesa 8.0.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 fx5600: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB (324/551MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.5 Mesa 8.0.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 geforce3-ti200: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 200 (174/400MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.2 Mesa 8.0.2, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 geforce33-ti200: Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @ 1.67GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: MSI MS-6738, Chipset: VIA VT8375, Memory: 748MB, Disk: 40GB Seagate ST340015A, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 200 (174/400MHz), Audio: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237, Monitor: HP 2229h, Network: VIA VT6102 OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-25-generic (i686), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: nouveau 0.0.16, OpenGL: 1.2 Mesa 8.0.2, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 GtkPerf 0.40 GtkComboBox Seconds < Lower Is Better amb+geforce . 172.15 |================================================== nvdia ....... 194.34 |========================================================= GtkPerf 0.40 GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs Seconds < Lower Is Better amb+geforce . 45.84 |========================================================== nvdia ....... 23.53 |============================== GtkPerf 0.40 GtkRadioButton Seconds < Lower Is Better amb+geforce . 108.75 |========================================================= nvdia ....... 91.47 |================================================ QGears2 XRender + Gears Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better amb+geforce . 32.87 |========================================================== nvdia ....... 29.31 |==================================================== QGears2 XRender + Text Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better amb+geforce . 31.89 |========================================================== nvdia ....... 30.80 |======================================================== QGears2 XRender + Image Scaling Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better amb+geforce . 60.97 |======================================================= nvdia ....... 63.86 |========================================================== QGears2 OpenGL + Image Scaling Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better amb+geforce . 94.81 |===================== nvdia ....... 254.01 |========================================================= QGears2 OpenGL + Gears Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better nvdia . 79.75 |================================================================ JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 19519.81 |============================================= geforce3-ti200 . 22641.75 |==================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 8776.89 |===================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 8826.20 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 28320.00 |==================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 26875.16 |================================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 4669.31 |============================================== geforce3-ti200 . 5335.89 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 61653.10 |=============================================== geforce3-ti200 . 67644.31 |==================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 43297.40 |==================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 18088.21 |====================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 141374.56 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 98967.22 |==================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 14951.51 |==================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 9350.10 |================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 240.41 |================================================= geforce3-ti200 . 263.36 |====================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 17.56 |======================================================= geforce3-ti200 . 16.90 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 204.10 |====================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 196.98 |==================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 14.61 |======================================================= geforce3-ti200 . 13.24 |================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 536.58 |====================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 494.64 |================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 67.69 |======================================================= geforce3-ti200 . 56.76 |============================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 1082.99 |===================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 1089.06 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 85.88 |======================================================= geforce3-ti200 . 70.16 |============================================= JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 6509.34 |===================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 6508.64 |===================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 631.51 |====================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 593.64 |=================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 23286.31 |==================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 22572.60 |================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 10685.68 |==================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 9132.99 |============================================ JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 32x32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 10428.40 |========================================= geforce3-ti200 . 13139.12 |==================================================== JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 128x128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ..... 5624.31 |=================================================== geforce3-ti200 . 5825.48 |===================================================== x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px PutImage Square Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 11.50 |=============== fx5600 .......... 30.40 |========================================= geforce33-ti200 . 40.20 |====================================================== x11perf 1.5 Test: Scrolling 500 x 500 px Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 2198 |========================================== fx5600 .......... 2850 |======================================================= geforce33-ti200 . 1167 |======================= x11perf 1.5 Test: Fill 300 x 300px AA Trapezoid Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 1093 |============================================== fx5600 .......... 1307 |======================================================= geforce33-ti200 . 487 |==================== x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px Copy From Window To Window Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 6863 |======================================================= fx5600 .......... 3047 |======================== geforce33-ti200 . 1150 |========= x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px Compositing From Pixmap To Window Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 22470 |====================================================== fx5600 .......... 3070 |======= geforce33-ti200 . 1153 |=== x11perf 1.5 Test: 500px Compositing From Window To Window Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 2663 |================================================ fx5600 .......... 3043 |======================================================= geforce33-ti200 . 1160 |===================== x11perf 1.5 Test: Copy 500x500 From Pixmap To Pixmap Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 2673 |================================================ fx5600 .......... 3067 |======================================================= geforce33-ti200 . 1157 |===================== x11perf 1.5 Test: PutImage XY 500x500 Square Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 0.30 |======================================================= fx5600 .......... 0.10 |================== geforce33-ti200 . 0.10 |================== x11perf 1.5 Test: Char in 80-char aa line Operations / Second > Higher Is Better nvidia5600 ...... 144167 |=============== fx5600 .......... 500667 |===================================================== geforce33-ti200 . 425667 |============================================= OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better fx5600 . 25 |==================================================================