E31270
Intel Xeon E31270 testing with a Supermicro X9SCI/X9SCA v0123456789 and Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


X9SCA+E31270+4GB: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon E31270 @ 3.39GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X9SCI/X9SCA v0123456789, Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 Family DRAM, Memory: 2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333MHz, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WD5003ABYX-0, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450, Monitor: SyncMaster, Network: Intel 82574L Gigabit Connection

	OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.2.0-24-generic-pae (i686), Desktop: Unity 2D 5.10.0, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, Display Driver: vesa 2.3.0, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024


Apache Benchmark 2.2.21
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 33962.12 |==================================================


hdparm Timed Disk Reads
Disk To Read: /dev/sda
MB/s > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 131.11 |====================================================


BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Dhrystone 2
LPS > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 20376408.47 |===============================================


BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Register Arithmetic
LPS > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 1 |=========================================================


BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Integer Arithmetic
LPS > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 1 |=========================================================


BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Floating-Point Arithmetic
LPS > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 1 |=========================================================


7-Zip Compression 9.20.1
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 11877 |=====================================================


C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 109.79 |====================================================


FFmpeg 0.10
AVI To NTSC VCD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 12.76 |=====================================================


John The Ripper 1.7.9
Test: Traditional DES
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 3921333 |===================================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 12552.87 |==================================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 12594.94 |==================================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 12552.50 |==================================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 12595.57 |==================================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 14179.90 |==================================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 14244.74 |==================================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 14194.17 |==================================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 14240.17 |==================================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 13369.51 |==================================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
X9SCA+E31270+4GB . 13416.41 |==================================================