hpblade-java

VMware testing on CentOS 6.1 (Final) via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1204261-BY-HPBLADEJA60
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
HP BL460c Java Suite
April 26 2012
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


hpblade-javaOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Xeon X5670 @ 2.93GHz (2 Cores)Intel 440BXIntel 440BX/ZX/DX8192MB21GB Virtual diskVMware SVGA IIIntel 82545EM GigabitCentOS 6.1 (Final)2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64 (x86_64)GCC 4.4.5 20110214ext4VMwareProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelCompilerFile-SystemSystem LayerHpblade-java BenchmarksSystem Logs- Java SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_29-b11). SELinux: Enabled.

hpblade-javasunflow: Global Illumination + Image Synthesisbork: File Encryption Timejava-scimark2: FFT Performancejava-scimark2: SOR Performancejava-scimark2: Monte Carlo Performancejava-scimark2: Composite PerformanceHP BL460c Java Suite9.8320.13695.331263.27601.621149.42OpenBenchmarking.org

Sunflow Rendering System

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSunflow Rendering System 0.07.2Global Illumination + Image SynthesisHP BL460c Java Suite3691215SE +/- 0.12, N = 29.83

Bork File Encrypter

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBork File Encrypter 1.4File Encryption TimeHP BL460c Java Suite510152025SE +/- 1.20, N = 620.13

Java SciMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0FFT PerformanceHP BL460c Java Suite150300450600750SE +/- 0.27, N = 4695.33

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0SOR PerformanceHP BL460c Java Suite30060090012001500SE +/- 0.20, N = 41263.27

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Monte Carlo PerformanceHP BL460c Java Suite130260390520650SE +/- 0.42, N = 4601.62

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Composite PerformanceHP BL460c Java Suite2004006008001000SE +/- 10.70, N = 41149.42