Texas Instruments OMAP4660
ARMv7 rev 10 testing with a OMAP4 Panda board and Texas Instruments OMAP on Ubuntu 11.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES: 

	Processor: ARMv7 rev 10 (2 Cores), Motherboard: OMAP4 Panda board, Memory: 914MB, Disk: 16GB SD16G, Graphics: Texas Instruments OMAP

	OS: Ubuntu 11.10, Kernel: 3.0.0-1206-omap4 (armv7l), Desktop: Unity 2D 4.24.0, Display Driver: fbdev 0.4.2, Compiler: GCC 4.6.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080


Apache Benchmark 2.2.17
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 770.32 |=========================================


Timed Apache Compilation 2.2.17
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 540.59 |=========================================


Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.6.3-4
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 2029.33 |========================================


Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.0-rc3
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 878.56 |=========================================


BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Dhrystone 2
LPS > Higher Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 2027085.63 |=====================================


BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Register Arithmetic
LPS > Higher Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 1 |==============================================


BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Integer Arithmetic
LPS > Higher Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 1 |==============================================


BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Floating-Point Arithmetic
LPS > Higher Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 1 |==============================================


CLOMP 3.3
Static OMP Speedup
Speedup > Higher Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 2.01 |===========================================


CacheBench
Test: Read
MB/s > Higher Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 1012.03 |========================================


CacheBench
Test: Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 2048.81 |========================================


CacheBench
Test: Read / Modify / Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 1488.17 |========================================


7-Zip Compression 9.20.1
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 528 |============================================


Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864
Multiple Sequence Alignment
Seconds < Lower Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 258.21 |=========================================


OpenSSL 1.0.0e
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
TI OMAP4660 / PandaBoard ES . 2.70 |===========================================