PogoplugPro
Running pts/scimark2-1.1.1.


test1: 

	Processor: ARMv6-compatible rev 5 (2 Cores), Motherboard: Oxsemi NAS, Memory: 122MB, Disk: 1000GB Seagate ST31000524AS

	OS: 2011.06-oxnas, Kernel: 2.6.31.6_SMP_820 (armv6l), Compiler: GCC 4.6.0, File-System: ext2/ext3

compare pinkvs vs pro: 

	Processor: Feroceon 88FR131 rev 1 (1 Core), Motherboard: Marvell SheevaPlug Board, Memory: 247MB, Disk: 100GB 0G9AT00 + 165GB 6DLAT80 + 1000GB HD103SI

	OS: 2011.02, Kernel: 2.6.38 (armv5tel), Compiler: GCC 4.6.0, File-System: ext2/ext3


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
test1 ................. 6.26 |=======================================
compare pinkvs vs pro . 7.83 |=================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
test1 ................. 2.84 |=====================================
compare pinkvs vs pro . 3.79 |=================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
test1 ................. 8.85  |======================================
compare pinkvs vs pro . 11.17 |================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
test1 ................. 4.31 |====================================
compare pinkvs vs pro . 5.94 |=================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
test1 ................. 7.32 |=========================================
compare pinkvs vs pro . 8.84 |=================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
test1 ................. 7.97 |=========================================
compare pinkvs vs pro . 9.43 |=================================================