PogoplugPro

Running pts/scimark2-1.1.1.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1106066-IV-1106064IV89
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
test1
June 06 2011
 
compare pinkvs vs pro
June 06 2011
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

test1

Processor: ARMv6-compatible rev 5 (2 Cores), Motherboard: Oxsemi NAS, Memory: 122MB, Disk: 1000GB Seagate ST31000524AS

OS: 2011.06-oxnas, Kernel: 2.6.31.6_SMP_820 (armv6l), Compiler: GCC 4.6.0, File-System: ext2/ext3

System Notes: .

compare pinkvs vs pro

Processor: Feroceon 88FR131 rev 1 (1 Core), Motherboard: Marvell SheevaPlug Board, Memory: 247MB, Disk: 100GB 0G9AT00 + 165GB 6DLAT80 + 1000GB HD103SI

OS: 2011.02, Kernel: 2.6.38 (armv5tel), Compiler: GCC 4.6.0, File-System: ext2/ext3

PogoplugProProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskOSKernelCompilerFile-Systemtest1compare pinkvs vs proARMv6-compatible rev 5 (2 Cores)Oxsemi NAS122MB1000GB Seagate ST31000524AS2011.06-oxnas2.6.31.6_SMP_820 (armv6l)GCC 4.6.0ext2/ext3Feroceon 88FR131 rev 1 (1 Core)Marvell SheevaPlug Board247MB100GB 0G9AT00 + 165GB 6DLAT80 + 1000GB HD103SI2011.022.6.38 (armv5tel)OpenBenchmarking.orgSystem Details- .

test1 vs. compare pinkvs vs pro ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+9.5%+9.5%+19%+19%+28.5%+28.5%37.8%33.5%26.2%25.1%20.8%18.3%Monte CarloF.F.TJ.S.O.RCompositeS.M.MD.L.M.FSciMarkSciMarkSciMarkSciMarkSciMarkSciMarktest1compare pinkvs vs pro

PogoplugProscimark2: Compositescimark2: Fast Fourier Transformscimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationscimark2: Monte Carloscimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiplyscimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationtest1compare pinkvs vs pro6.262.848.854.317.327.977.833.7911.175.948.849.43OpenBenchmarking.org

SciMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Compositetest1compare pinkvs vs pro246810SE +/- 0.00, N = 4SE +/- 0.01, N = 46.267.83
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Compositetest1compare pinkvs vs pro3691215Min: 6.25 / Avg: 6.26 / Max: 6.26Min: 7.81 / Avg: 7.83 / Max: 7.84

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transformtest1compare pinkvs vs pro0.85281.70562.55843.41124.264SE +/- 0.00, N = 4SE +/- 0.00, N = 42.843.79
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transformtest1compare pinkvs vs pro246810Min: 2.83 / Avg: 2.84 / Max: 2.85Min: 3.78 / Avg: 3.79 / Max: 3.79

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationtest1compare pinkvs vs pro3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 4SE +/- 0.02, N = 48.8511.17
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationtest1compare pinkvs vs pro3691215Min: 8.84 / Avg: 8.85 / Max: 8.87Min: 11.09 / Avg: 11.17 / Max: 11.19

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte Carlotest1compare pinkvs vs pro1.33652.6734.00955.3466.6825SE +/- 0.00, N = 4SE +/- 0.01, N = 44.315.94
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte Carlotest1compare pinkvs vs pro246810Min: 4.31 / Avg: 4.31 / Max: 4.32Min: 5.93 / Avg: 5.94 / Max: 5.95

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiplytest1compare pinkvs vs pro246810SE +/- 0.01, N = 4SE +/- 0.01, N = 47.328.84
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiplytest1compare pinkvs vs pro3691215Min: 7.31 / Avg: 7.32 / Max: 7.34Min: 8.82 / Avg: 8.84 / Max: 8.86

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationtest1compare pinkvs vs pro3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 4SE +/- 0.00, N = 47.979.43
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationtest1compare pinkvs vs pro3691215Min: 7.95 / Avg: 7.97 / Max: 7.99Min: 9.42 / Avg: 9.43 / Max: 9.43

test1

Processor: ARMv6-compatible rev 5 (2 Cores), Motherboard: Oxsemi NAS, Memory: 122MB, Disk: 1000GB Seagate ST31000524AS

OS: 2011.06-oxnas, Kernel: 2.6.31.6_SMP_820 (armv6l), Compiler: GCC 4.6.0, File-System: ext2/ext3

System Notes: .

Testing initiated at 6 June 2011 20:27 by user .

compare pinkvs vs pro

Processor: Feroceon 88FR131 rev 1 (1 Core), Motherboard: Marvell SheevaPlug Board, Memory: 247MB, Disk: 100GB 0G9AT00 + 165GB 6DLAT80 + 1000GB HD103SI

OS: 2011.02, Kernel: 2.6.38 (armv5tel), Compiler: GCC 4.6.0, File-System: ext2/ext3

System Notes: .

Testing initiated at 6 June 2011 20:44 by user .