Running pts/postmark-1.0.0.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1104248-JESS-110419736.
postmarkudProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionOpenGLpostmarkudeskpostmarkUnpostmarkMIntel Atom N450 @ 1.67GHz (2 Cores)LENOVO Caucasus2Intel N10 Family DMI Bridge1024MB250GB Western Digital WDC WD2500BEVT-2Intel N10 Family IGP 256MBConexant CX20582 (Pebble)Ubuntu 10.102.6.35-28-generic (i686)GNOME 2.32.0X Server 1.9.0intel 2.12.0GCC 4.4.5ext41024x6002.6.35-22-generic (i686)Intel Pineview DMI BridgeIntel Pineview IGPMeeGo release 1.1 (MeeGo)2.6.35.3-10.3-netbook (i686)intel1.4 Mesa 7.9-develGCC 4.5.0btrfsOpenBenchmarking.orgSystem Details- postmarkudesk: Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Compiz and Firefox were running on this system. Intel SpeedStep was enabled. This was running on battery power. - postmarkUn: Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Intel SpeedStep was enabled.- postmarkM: Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Intel SpeedStep was enabled.
postmarkudpostmark: Disk Transaction PerformanceDifferenceStandard ErrorStandard DeviationpostmarkudeskpostmarkUnpostmarkM3921.80x11.459.25%2181.00x1.201.23%3751.72x1.220.73%OpenBenchmarking.org
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction PerformancepostmarkudeskpostmarkUnpostmarkM90180270360450SE +/- 11.45, N = 10SE +/- 1.20, N = 5SE +/- 1.22, N = 5392218375
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4