Intel Core 2 Duo Running pts/aio-stress-1.1.0, pts/apache-1.3.0, pts/pgbench-1.2.0, pts/sqlite-1.8.0, pts/build-apache-1.4.0, pts/build-linux-kernel-1.2.0, pts/bullet-1.0.0, pts/byte-1.1.0, pts/c-ray-1.0.0, pts/smallpt-1.0.0, pts/clomp-1.0.0, pts/compress-7zip-1.5.0, pts/compress-lzma-1.2.0, pts/compress-pbzip2-1.3.0, pts/compress-gzip-1.1.0, pts/dbench-1.0.0, pts/encode-mp3-1.3.1, pts/encode-ogg-1.2.0, pts/encode-flac-1.2.0, pts/encode-ape-1.3.0, pts/encode-wavpack-1.2.0, pts/mencoder-1.3.0, pts/ffmpeg-1.5.0, pts/x264-1.2.0, pts/fs-mark-1.0.0, pts/gcrypt-1.0.0, pts/openssl-1.5.0, pts/graphics-magick-1.4.1, pts/gmpbench-1.0.1, pts/himeno-1.0.0, pts/scimark2-1.1.1, pts/mafft-1.2.0, pts/hmmer-1.1.0, pts/minion-1.2.0, pts/mrbayes-1.2.0, pts/nginx-1.0.0, pts/postmark-1.0.0, pts/pybench-1.0.0, pts/stream-1.1.0, pts/ttsiod-renderer-1.2.0. Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz: Processor: Intel OS: Ubuntu 10.10, Kernel: 2.6.35-22-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME 2.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.9.0, Display Driver: fglrx 8.81.5, OpenGL: 3.3.10428, Compiler: GCC 4.4.5, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 AIO-Stress 0.21 Test: Random Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 19.29 |=========================================== SQLite 3.7.3 Test Target: Default Test Directory Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 797.18 |========================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.2.17 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 32.44 |=========================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 2.6.25 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 723.95 |========================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.75 Test: 3000 Fall Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 16.80 |=========================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.75 Test: 1000 Stack Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 17.22 |=========================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.75 Test: 136 Ragdolls Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 7.47 |============================================ Bullet Physics Engine 2.75 Test: 1000 Convex Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 10.67 |=========================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.75 Test: Prim Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 11.02 |=========================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.75 Test: Convex Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 19.80 |=========================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.75 Test: Raytests Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 23.09 |=========================================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 22540373.70 |===================================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Register Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 3733055.80 |====================================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Integer Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 3737635.50 |====================================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Floating-Point Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 3147728.97 |====================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 129.99 |========================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 282 |============================================= CLOMP 3.3 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 1.78 |============================================ LZMA Compression 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 177.47 |========================================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.0.5 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 18.74 |=========================================== Gzip Compression 2GB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 36.12 |=========================================== Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 1 MB/s > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 12.46 |=========================================== Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 6 MB/s > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 46.16 |=========================================== Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 12 MB/s > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 66.49 |=========================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.98.2 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 22.50 |=========================================== Ogg Encoding 1.2.0 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 9.74 |============================================ FLAC Audio Encoding 1.2.1 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 7.87 |============================================ Monkey Audio Encoding 3.99u4b5s6 WAV To APE Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 8.47 |============================================ WavPack Audio Encoding 4.41.0 WAV To WavPack Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 9.86 |============================================ Mencoder 2009-06-04 AVI To LAVC Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 20.51 |=========================================== FFmpeg 0.6.1 AVI To NTSC VCD Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 12.31 |=========================================== x264 2010-11-22 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 33.80 |=========================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 128 |============================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: Blur Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 65 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: Local Adaptive Thresholding Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 33 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 87 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.12 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 30 |============================================== GMPbench 0.1 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 15275 |=========================================== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 264.29 |========================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 763.44 |========================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 1135.50 |========================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 298.26 |========================================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.706 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 23.29 |=========================================== Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 30.37 |=========================================== Minion 0.9 Benchmark: Bibd Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 147.47 |========================================== Minion 0.9 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 77.80 |=========================================== Minion 0.9 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 162.66 |========================================== Minion 0.9 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 131.25 |========================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.1.2 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 38.24 |=========================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 354 |============================================= TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.1v Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.87GHz . 59.16 |===========================================